←back to thread

202 points akersten | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.257s | source
Show context
johncolanduoni ◴[] No.45767803[source]
The things that are and aren’t considered essential enough to fund during a government shutdown are insane. Is this enshrined in a statute somewhere? Feels like adding air traffic controllers to that list should be a no-brainer (and broadly politically popular).
replies(6): >>45767816 #>>45767839 #>>45767846 #>>45767847 #>>45767873 #>>45767956 #
crm9125 ◴[] No.45767847[source]
Meh, flying is a luxury. We can all stay put until the government pulls its head out of its ass.
replies(3): >>45767878 #>>45767890 #>>45767900 #
johncolanduoni ◴[] No.45767890[source]
Not if you want the economy to keep functioning. A lot of people doing real work (e.g. engineers flying out to fix medical devices) rely on air travel.
replies(1): >>45767991 #
crm9125 ◴[] No.45767991[source]
More people will die if the democrats capitulate, than those from malfunctioning medicals devices (or other reasons). I think you should do more research to understand the true cause and effect of the decisions in the current situation the U.S. finds itself in.
replies(2): >>45768044 #>>45768278 #
1. johncolanduoni ◴[] No.45768044[source]
I’m not arguing they should capitulate - I’m arguing that we should fund ATC (and some other things) like we do Congress’s salaries. Or just authorize current spending levels by default if Congress shits the bed and simply not have this insane brinksmanship.

I happen to agree on the object level issue of maintaining the Medicaid funding. Thanks for talking down to me, though.