←back to thread

Denmark reportedly withdraws Chat Control proposal following controversy

(therecord.media)
568 points layer8 | 2 comments | 30 Oct 25 21:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.439s | source
Show context
FinnKuhn ◴[30 Oct 25 23:07 UTC] No.45766467[source]▶
> The last chance for an agreement under Danish leadership is in December; the government in Copenhagen apparently preferred a compromise without chat control to no agreement at all. The current regulation, which allows the large platform providers to voluntarily and actively search for potential depictions of abuse, expires next spring after extension. It is precisely this voluntariness that Denmark's Minister of Justice now wants to codify within the framework of the future CSA regulation, which also contains a multitude of other, less controversial projects. [1]

Doesn't sound like it is over yet - only delayed.

[1] https://www.heise.de/en/news/Denmark-surprisingly-abandons-p...

replies(6): >>45766727 #>>45766789 #>>45766836 #>>45766914 #>>45767401 #>>45771111 #
ericd ◴[31 Oct 25 00:03 UTC] No.45766914[source]▶
The "Yes"/"Maybe Later" school of governance.
replies(2): >>45767154 #>>45767329 #
vkou ◴[31 Oct 25 00:43 UTC] No.45767154[source]▶
That is the only way to run a government.

Consider for a moment what a government of "Yes"/"No Forever, without ever revisiting the question" would result in.

We aren't at the end of history.

replies(8): >>45767213 #>>45767274 #>>45767282 #>>45767498 #>>45767506 #>>45768059 #>>45769705 #>>45770205 #
1. potato3732842 ◴[31 Oct 25 01:03 UTC] No.45767274[source]▶
>Consider for a moment what a government of "Yes"/"No Forever, without ever revisiting the question" would result in.

That's pretty much what the US constitution is. Once something's in it, it doesn't realistically get out of it.

replies(1): >>45767455 #
2. vkou ◴[31 Oct 25 01:39 UTC] No.45767455[source]▶
The bar for adding something to it is the same bar for removing something from it. It's not 50%.