←back to thread

98 points _gdim | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mind-blight ◴[] No.45764179[source]
So their team is anonymous. While I understand the desire for that, trust is built through transparency. It's really hard to convince someone who's job, career, it potentially even life is at risk to trust random strangers on the Internet.

It seems like they need people willing to stretch their name to create credibility.

replies(5): >>45764300 #>>45765173 #>>45765849 #>>45766213 #>>45766966 #
ramon156 ◴[] No.45764300[source]
Have we forgotten you can authorize witho authenticating? I can prove I'm inside the Google office without saying who I am
replies(4): >>45764358 #>>45764472 #>>45765363 #>>45767197 #
1. embedding-shape ◴[] No.45765363[source]
Wrong direction, parent is asking for clarity who owns and operate the platform itself, not clarity around who the whistleblower is.