Most active commenters
  • pms(7)
  • Workaccount2(3)

←back to thread

Meta and TikTok are obstructing researchers' access to data, EU commission rules

(www.science.org)
187 points anigbrowl | 12 comments | 29 Oct 25 22:54 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
Workaccount2 ◴[29 Oct 25 23:57 UTC] No.45754696[source]▶
Europe doing everything possible to scare away modern industry.
replies(3): >>45754856 #>>45755018 #>>45756091 #
pms ◴[30 Oct 25 00:18 UTC] No.45754856[source]▶
I hope it's quite the opposite, since this can lead to innovation as we figure out how to depolarize social media platforms or how to develop more politically neutral online media.
replies(2): >>45755080 #>>45755632 #
mc32 ◴[30 Oct 25 00:45 UTC] No.45755080[source]▶
I agree on the need for depolarization (go back to timelines and get rid of recommendation engines) but once you cede control of content to government even if it's for things people would agree on like "nuke that misinformation" you will end up being a mouthpiece for the government in power -whoever it be. Look at how "innocent" embeds wholly shaped the messaging on Covid and how they sidelined all dissent (lots of people of renown and stature within relevant disciplines)
replies(1): >>45755249 #
1. pms ◴[30 Oct 25 01:09 UTC] No.45755249[source]▶
That's a great point. I agree that's a danger, but please note DSA doesn't cede the control of content to government, but rather it creates an institution of (national) Digital Service Coordinators (DSCs) that decide whether a researcher's access to data is well-reasoned. In most cases that institution will be in a different country (the country of company's EU's HQs) than the researcher. That said, there could be malicious players involved, e.g., researchers and respective DSCs secretly recruited by a government to influence elections. This, however, sounds implausible, since in principle both the DSCs and researchers are independent from national governments.

Also, we can have depolarized recommendation algorithms. We don't need to go back all the way to timelines.

replies(2): >>45755482 #>>45755664 #
2. thesmtsolver ◴[30 Oct 25 01:41 UTC] No.45755482[source]▶
That's quite optimistic given EU's track record in practice.

E.g., DieselGate. Europe was more impacted but US caught Volkswagen cheating.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal#E...

replies(1): >>45755520 #
3. pms ◴[30 Oct 25 01:47 UTC] No.45755520[source]▶
It's also quite optimistic to think that the industry will self-regulate, as the recent history of Boeing 737 MAX shows...
replies(2): >>45755565 #>>45755631 #
4. mc32 ◴[30 Oct 25 01:54 UTC] No.45755565{3}[source]▶
It’s also optimistic to think the gov will do what’s good for the people as exemplified by Chernobyl.

There is no “good” answer. Each has its pros and cons.

replies(1): >>45758736 #
5. thesmtsolver ◴[30 Oct 25 02:04 UTC] No.45755631{3}[source]▶
No one is saying that the industry will self-regulate. There is a right amount of regulation and all evidence points that the EU is over that limit. The US is below (probably) but closer.
replies(1): >>45758732 #
6. terminalshort ◴[30 Oct 25 02:08 UTC] No.45755664[source]▶
This reads to me like: "please note DSA doesn't cede the control of content to government, but rather it creates a more obfuscated and shady government that pretends not to be a government, but is actually 10x worse and completely devoid of democratic control, and then it cedes control to that."
7. pms ◴[30 Oct 25 11:16 UTC] No.45758732{4}[source]▶
That's not clear to me at all. Would you mind elaborating?
replies(1): >>45759908 #
8. pms ◴[30 Oct 25 11:17 UTC] No.45758736{4}[source]▶
Yes, which is why we need to balance who has power, and facilitate independent research, rather than to give away to either industry or government.
9. Workaccount2 ◴[30 Oct 25 13:37 UTC] No.45759908{5}[source]▶
Europe has a borderline shrinking economy and failed to become a player in the advanced technologies driving the world economy today. It's because they created an extremely hostile business environment, leading to founders going to the US to start their business there instead.

So now Europe is a continent full of people using American made software, running on American and Chinese made hardware, going on American social media to talk about how Europe is totally fine because they only work 9 months out of the year and don't allow young people to become billionaires.

replies(1): >>45762618 #
10. pms ◴[30 Oct 25 17:28 UTC] No.45762618{6}[source]▶
I do think Europe should become more self-reliant. I also work a lot and rarely take any vacation time, but I don't see any sense -- except for egoism -- in working so much just to spread more AI slop online, mislead and polarize societies, or support a genocide. I think Europe has learned its lesson during the World Wars.
replies(1): >>45767682 #
11. Workaccount2 ◴[31 Oct 25 02:25 UTC] No.45767682{7}[source]▶
They are on the cusp of learning it again. When the economic floor falls out, nationalism will race back.
replies(1): >>45769738 #
12. pms ◴[31 Oct 25 08:48 UTC] No.45769738{8}[source]▶
Clearly US Republicans, Russia, and Israel drive a push towards nationalism. Republicans and Elon Musk openly campaign for far-right European parties like AfD. You're getting causality wrong, or just don't want to recognize it, because the reality (rightfully) isn't as motivating as your image of it -- at least it shouldn't, but do you care?