(steveklabnik.com)

325 points steveklabnik | 2 comments | 22 Oct 25 17:21 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source

Show context

jmercouris ◴[22 Oct 25 20:01 UTC] No.45674396[source]▶

>>45672280 (OP) #

After reading the article, the technical merits of `jj` are completely unclear.

replies(3): >>45674421 #>>45676645 #>>45678950 #

keyle[dead post] ◴[22 Oct 25 23:57 UTC] No.45676645[source]▶

>>45674396 #

[flagged]

1. dcre ◴[23 Oct 25 03:13 UTC] No.45677796[source]▶

>>45676763 (TP) #

This is very funny. People just love jj! There are no conflicts of interest, at least not until now that there is a company built around jj. But they also started it because they love jj!

replies(1): >>45678797 #

2. hu3 ◴[23 Oct 25 06:26 UTC] No.45678797[source]▶

>>45677796 #

It would be naive to think the company initiative didn't starte some time ago, before content started being posted even.

And there's still no disclaimer so your point is moot.

↑

I see a future in jj