←back to thread

196 points zmccormick7 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
aliljet ◴[] No.45387614[source]
There's a misunderstanding here broadly. Context could be infinite, but the real bottleneck is understanding intent late in a multi-step operation. A human can effectively discard or disregard prior information as the narrow window of focus moves to a new task, LLMs seem incredibly bad at this.

Having more context, but leaving open an inability to effectively focus on the latest task is the real problem.

replies(10): >>45387639 #>>45387672 #>>45387700 #>>45387992 #>>45388228 #>>45388271 #>>45388664 #>>45388965 #>>45389266 #>>45404093 #
raincole ◴[] No.45388664[source]
Humans have a very strong tendency (and have made tremendous collective efforts) to compress context. I'm not a neuroscientist but I believe it's called "chunk."

Language itself is a highly compressed form of compressed context. Like when you read "hoist with one's own petard" you don't just think about literal petard but the context behind this phrase.

replies(1): >>45388852 #
PantaloonFlames ◴[] No.45388852[source]
We don’t think of petards because no one knows what that is. :)
replies(1): >>45390018 #
1. KineticLensman ◴[] No.45390018{3}[source]
For anyone wondering, it means blown into the air (‘hoist’) by your own bomb (‘petard’). From Shakespeare