←back to thread

196 points zmccormick7 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
aliljet ◴[] No.45387614[source]
There's a misunderstanding here broadly. Context could be infinite, but the real bottleneck is understanding intent late in a multi-step operation. A human can effectively discard or disregard prior information as the narrow window of focus moves to a new task, LLMs seem incredibly bad at this.

Having more context, but leaving open an inability to effectively focus on the latest task is the real problem.

replies(10): >>45387639 #>>45387672 #>>45387700 #>>45387992 #>>45388228 #>>45388271 #>>45388664 #>>45388965 #>>45389266 #>>45404093 #
neutronicus ◴[] No.45387672[source]
No, I think context itself is still an issue.

Coding agents choke on our big C++ code-base pretty spectacularly if asked to reference large files.

replies(4): >>45387769 #>>45388023 #>>45388024 #>>45388311 #
AlGoreRhythm ◴[] No.45388311[source]
Out of curiosity, how would you rate an LLM’s ability to deal with pointers in C++ code?
replies(2): >>45389012 #>>45389408 #
jdrek1 ◴[] No.45389408[source]
If you have lots of pointers, you're writing C, not C++.
replies(1): >>45389622 #
1. neutronicus ◴[] No.45389622{3}[source]
Eh, it's a big tent