←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.003s | source
Show context
dark_mode ◴[] No.45375569[source]
> The decision has not affected Microsoft’s wider commercial relationship with the IDF, which is a longstanding client and will retain access to other services. The termination will raise questions within Israel about the policy of holding sensitive military data in a third-party cloud hosted overseas.

It's worth noting that even after finding out the "most moral" army is conducting mass surveillance, they're still happy to provide them services.

replies(7): >>45377571 #>>45377671 #>>45377762 #>>45379434 #>>45381203 #>>45381719 #>>45383596 #
tick_tock_tick ◴[] No.45377762[source]
Doesn't every army conduct "mass surveillance"? What do you think all those satellites with cameras are doing orbiting the planet?

Wouldn't the opposite be incredibly immoral? Attacking/bombing/etc without large scale surveillance would largely mean increased collateral damage.

replies(8): >>45377948 #>>45377972 #>>45379258 #>>45379533 #>>45379765 #>>45379827 #>>45380276 #>>45383560 #
ycombigators ◴[] No.45379765[source]
It would be pretty difficult for the IDF to increase their level of collateral damage.
replies(1): >>45381536 #
sir0010010 ◴[] No.45381536{3}[source]
In 1945, about ~90k people died over 2 days from the Tokyo Firebombing. Do you think it would be difficult for any modern millitary - that intentionally wanted to cause as much collateral damage as possible - to greatly exceed that number?
replies(2): >>45381838 #>>45401981 #
fjdjshsh ◴[] No.45381838{4}[source]
Not sure what is your point. The Israeli military could throw a few atomic bombs and wipe out the entire population in Gaza. That they don't is a sign of restraint for you?
replies(2): >>45382083 #>>45383720 #
1. Jensson ◴[] No.45383720{5}[source]
It shows the poster they responded to was wrong when they said "It would be pretty difficult for the IDF to increase their level of collateral damage.".

It wouldn't be difficult at all to increase collateral damage, just fight like they did during ww2 and collateral damage would skyrocket.

replies(1): >>45402005 #