←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.33s | source
Show context
jajuuka ◴[] No.45374111[source]
Wow, they actually are pulling back. That is really surprising. Wonder if they see the winds changing on this issue and want to get on the right side of history. Big props to everyone at Microsoft who spoke out about this and risked or lost their jobs because of it. They kept that fire lit on their ass.
replies(3): >>45374160 #>>45374165 #>>45376458 #
slantedview ◴[] No.45374160[source]
Last week a UN human rights commission found that Israel is carrying out a genocide. I think you're right that the winds have changed and now companies will shift their positions.
replies(1): >>45374208 #
mrits[dead post] ◴[] No.45374208[source]
[flagged]
computerex ◴[] No.45374257[source]
The word genocide has a legal definition, it’s not up for discussion or debate. What is happening in Gaza is a genocide according to genocide scholars.
replies(8): >>45374372 #>>45374558 #>>45374646 #>>45374833 #>>45374998 #>>45375452 #>>45377363 #>>45380807 #
skinkestek ◴[] No.45374833[source]
It shouldn't be.

But here we have UN and other twisting it to fit a situation that clearly weren't meant to be covered by it.

Because if the war in Gaza can be called a genocide so can almost every single other major war!

Also it is absolutely ridiculous to call a war that is started by one side, and one that only that side can end, a genocide against the same side that started it!

replies(3): >>45375127 #>>45380779 #>>45383556 #
1. ragazzina ◴[] No.45383556[source]
In your opinion, is there a neutral organization in the world that could define whether the legal definition of genocide is being met or not?