←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
politelemon ◴[] No.45374648[source]
I am seeing several kneejerk "Microsoft bad" reactions here, which HNers don't do for many other companies. I encourage many of you to read what is written.

They listened to their internal staff and stakeholders and public pressure, and did terminated the contract instead of ignoring it or doubling down.

That is a good thing.

replies(13): >>45374815 #>>45374894 #>>45374974 #>>45375153 #>>45375525 #>>45375631 #>>45376014 #>>45376174 #>>45376429 #>>45376653 #>>45376783 #>>45376815 #>>45380123 #
BrenBarn ◴[] No.45376783[source]
The problem is that if you're very very bad, you can do a good thing and still be very bad.
replies(1): >>45376811 #
hashim ◴[] No.45376811[source]
What other reasons are Microsoft very very bad? Genuinely curious about what your definition of "very, very bad" is and whether it aligns with mine.
replies(3): >>45376840 #>>45377973 #>>45382371 #
ahf8Aithaex7Nai ◴[] No.45376840[source]
Search for "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish".
replies(1): >>45376959 #
hashim ◴[] No.45376959[source]
So the criticisms from the 90s that I mentioned in my other comment? Yeah, I prefer to live in the modern world. It isn't Microsoft that needs to be hit with antitrusts in 2025. It's Apple and Google. Live moves on, and in 2025, Microsoft is one of the more ethical tech companies around, unless you're one of the many sheltered people in tech that think targeted advertising is manifest evil that's on par with enabling a genocide.
replies(2): >>45377023 #>>45379208 #
1. ◴[] No.45379208{5}[source]