←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
codeulike ◴[] No.45373831[source]
“I want to note our appreciation for the reporting of the Guardian,” [Microsoft’s vice-chair and president, Brad Smith] wrote, noting that it had brought to light “information we could not access in light of our customer privacy commitments”. He added: “Our review is ongoing.”

Its interesting that they seem to be saying they dont know the full details of how their customers are using Azure, due to privacy commitments.

replies(8): >>45374001 #>>45374241 #>>45374312 #>>45374319 #>>45374443 #>>45374448 #>>45374554 #>>45375003 #
Etheryte ◴[] No.45374312[source]
The whole point of confidential computing is that the cloud provider can't access your data and can't tell what you're doing with it. This is a must have requirement in many government contracts and other highly legislated fields.
replies(3): >>45374562 #>>45374812 #>>45380298 #
IlikeKitties ◴[] No.45374562[source]
I've personally never seen anything requiring confidential computing in anything. Is this required in the USA? I find that hard to believe, because the technology on a cloud level is still very beta-feeling. I think that Microsoft just never looked because they did not want to know.
replies(2): >>45375859 #>>45378681 #