←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
politelemon ◴[] No.45374648[source]
I am seeing several kneejerk "Microsoft bad" reactions here, which HNers don't do for many other companies. I encourage many of you to read what is written.

They listened to their internal staff and stakeholders and public pressure, and did terminated the contract instead of ignoring it or doubling down.

That is a good thing.

replies(13): >>45374815 #>>45374894 #>>45374974 #>>45375153 #>>45375525 #>>45375631 #>>45376014 #>>45376174 #>>45376429 #>>45376653 #>>45376783 #>>45376815 #>>45380123 #
nashashmi ◴[] No.45374974[source]
The Guardian last month reported a meeting between Microsoft CEO and Unit 8200. That means this comes from high level and they did not cancel because of protestors but because of media publicity.
replies(4): >>45375435 #>>45376472 #>>45376538 #>>45377067 #
yieldcrv ◴[] No.45377067[source]
or it means that they met with Unit 8200 to see if there was common ground that would rationalize keeping the contract and their tech being used for a way that respected human rights, dignity, and a coherent strategy to getting to that place,

and there wasn't

replies(1): >>45377652 #
1. hashim ◴[] No.45377652{3}[source]
I want to believe this is true, but it would only be true if they cancel all the contracts they have with Israel that enable the genocide, rather than just the ones that have made the most noise. Otherwise it's just PR, not ethics. In other words, a lot is resting on the "some" in that quote.