←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bArray ◴[] No.45374662[source]
The issue that people have with Israel's actions is the death of civilians, not the death of Hamas, the widely recognised terrorist. I believe it also to be true that the IDF do not want to kill civilians, and that their target is only Hamas.

In which case, is it prudent to remove the IDF's ability to successfully target the correct people? Precise military intelligence is absolutely necessary for minimising civilian casualties.

replies(16): >>45374746 #>>45374764 #>>45374793 #>>45375297 #>>45375572 #>>45375577 #>>45376619 #>>45376729 #>>45377223 #>>45377547 #>>45377564 #>>45377690 #>>45378300 #>>45378801 #>>45379156 #>>45379613 #
d0gsg0w00f[dead post] ◴[] No.45375572[source]
[flagged]
bArray ◴[] No.45375935[source]
> I know this will be unpopular, but I'm just repeating what I've heard from the Israeli side [..]

It's war, this is the unfortunate truth and why we try to avoid war. Nobody really ends up winning in this.

> This doesn't justify killing civilians, but what do you do when civilians kill you?

Then point at which a civilian picks up a weapon to operate alongside Hamas, they have become Hamas and are no longer civilians.

> It's a nasty situation no matter which side you look at it from.

Yes. But a peaceful solution was almost impossible once Hamas performed their October 7 attack. The other day the UN members agreed to recognise Palestine as a state, and now the only thing left on Hamas' manifesto is the complete destruction of Israel [1]. I suspect Israel is not inclined to negotiate on that demand.

[1] https://www.dni.gov/nctc/terrorist_groups/hamas.html

replies(1): >>45377577 #
1. ◴[] No.45377577[source]