←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
politelemon ◴[] No.45374648[source]
I am seeing several kneejerk "Microsoft bad" reactions here, which HNers don't do for many other companies. I encourage many of you to read what is written.

They listened to their internal staff and stakeholders and public pressure, and did terminated the contract instead of ignoring it or doubling down.

That is a good thing.

replies(13): >>45374815 #>>45374894 #>>45374974 #>>45375153 #>>45375525 #>>45375631 #>>45376014 #>>45376174 #>>45376429 #>>45376653 #>>45376783 #>>45376815 #>>45380123 #
n1b0m ◴[] No.45374815[source]
They fired staff who protested against the firm’s ties to the IDF.
replies(4): >>45374921 #>>45374941 #>>45375727 #>>45380444 #
sugarpimpdorsey ◴[] No.45374921[source]
That's a funny way to say "they fired staff that vandalized company property, broke into the CEO's office, and used an internal company website to publish and promote anti-company propaganda".

That will get you fired from bussing tables or washing dishes, let alone a six-figure job at MS.

Edit: Source on the last one; the first two were widely reported on in media:

https://lunduke.substack.com/p/fired-microsoft-employee-enco...

replies(5): >>45374950 #>>45374985 #>>45375122 #>>45375523 #>>45375653 #
nashashmi ◴[] No.45374950[source]
One protestor was fired after interrupting a CEO's speech.
replies(6): >>45375678 #>>45375684 #>>45375803 #>>45375829 #>>45376285 #>>45376378 #
t1amat ◴[] No.45375684{4}[source]
You might have 1A rights as an American but it seems to me the manner in which this person protested would be grounds for termination in many jurisdictions.
replies(2): >>45376140 #>>45376495 #
1. platevoltage ◴[] No.45376495{5}[source]
Literally nothing to do with 1A
replies(1): >>45376821 #
2. BrenBarn ◴[] No.45376821[source]
That's because 1A only has to do with a limited subset of the actual concept of freedom of speech.