←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.02s | source
Show context
bArray ◴[] No.45374662[source]
The issue that people have with Israel's actions is the death of civilians, not the death of Hamas, the widely recognised terrorist. I believe it also to be true that the IDF do not want to kill civilians, and that their target is only Hamas.

In which case, is it prudent to remove the IDF's ability to successfully target the correct people? Precise military intelligence is absolutely necessary for minimising civilian casualties.

replies(16): >>45374746 #>>45374764 #>>45374793 #>>45375297 #>>45375572 #>>45375577 #>>45376619 #>>45376729 #>>45377223 #>>45377547 #>>45377564 #>>45377690 #>>45378300 #>>45378801 #>>45379156 #>>45379613 #
roughly ◴[] No.45374746[source]
> I believe it also to be true that the IDF do not want to kill civilians, and that their target is only Hamas.

I think it’s this second assertion that relies on facts not in evidence. Previous Guardian reporting on IDF use of compute for targeting indicated they were using it to increase, not decrease, the number of approved targets.

replies(2): >>45375356 #>>45377086 #
1. flumpcakes ◴[] No.45375356[source]
Quantity doesn't correlate with accuracy. OP's point was that surely having more intelligence means you are more accurate and thus less collateral damage.
replies(2): >>45375789 #>>45376329 #
2. bArray ◴[] No.45375789[source]
Exactly. And an increase in accurate targets would lead to the faster removal of Hamas, and the process of repair can begin faster.
3. roughly ◴[] No.45376329[source]
Again, prior reporting on the IDF’s computational efforts do not indicate that less collateral damage was a driver - quite the contrary, the algorithm was being used to pad out targeting lists: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/israel-gaza-ai...

You’re describing what ought to be, not what currently is.