←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.4s | source
Show context
codeulike ◴[] No.45373831[source]
“I want to note our appreciation for the reporting of the Guardian,” [Microsoft’s vice-chair and president, Brad Smith] wrote, noting that it had brought to light “information we could not access in light of our customer privacy commitments”. He added: “Our review is ongoing.”

Its interesting that they seem to be saying they dont know the full details of how their customers are using Azure, due to privacy commitments.

replies(8): >>45374001 #>>45374241 #>>45374312 #>>45374319 #>>45374443 #>>45374448 #>>45374554 #>>45375003 #
covercash ◴[] No.45374443[source]
Weird, pretty sure employees brought this to their attention a few times already…

https://apnews.com/article/microsoft-azure-gaza-palestine-is...

https://apnews.com/article/microsoft-azure-gaza-israel-prote...

https://apnews.com/article/microsoft-build-israel-gaza-prote...

https://apnews.com/article/microsoft-protest-employees-fired...

replies(3): >>45374564 #>>45374981 #>>45375840 #
cl0ckt0wer ◴[] No.45374564[source]
If they act on information their employees report, they are violating their commitments.
replies(2): >>45374712 #>>45376498 #
sc68cal ◴[] No.45374712[source]
There have been public reports by major news organizations on the subject of Israel using big tech companies to surveil the West Bank and Gaza, for a decade. This isn't an issue of customer privacy.
replies(1): >>45374817 #
meowface ◴[] No.45374817[source]
The difference is that pre-2023 it could at least have some plausible excuse of trying to detect terrorist activity. With Israel's current actions in Gaza, there is no longer any plausible excuse or defense for any security action Israel is conducting towards Palestinians.
replies(2): >>45375031 #>>45375095 #
Aarostotle ◴[] No.45375095[source]
Did something happen in 2023 that makes it _less_ relevant for Israel to try to prevent terrorist activity?
replies(2): >>45375237 #>>45376255 #
1. fahhem ◴[] No.45377905[source]
Same bogus website used earlier. Please don't copy pasta bad hasbara
replies(2): >>45377987 #>>45378267 #
2. SilverElfin ◴[] No.45378267{3}[source]
Dismissing something as a “bogus website” or attacking the source isn’t an argument. It’s a logical fallacy.
replies(1): >>45392057 #
3. kelipso ◴[] No.45378839[source]
You’re the one openly promoting genocide.
4. fahhem ◴[] No.45392057{4}[source]
It was debunked in another comment so I didn't copy paste the debunking, sorry