←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
codeulike ◴[] No.45373831[source]
“I want to note our appreciation for the reporting of the Guardian,” [Microsoft’s vice-chair and president, Brad Smith] wrote, noting that it had brought to light “information we could not access in light of our customer privacy commitments”. He added: “Our review is ongoing.”

Its interesting that they seem to be saying they dont know the full details of how their customers are using Azure, due to privacy commitments.

replies(8): >>45374001 #>>45374241 #>>45374312 #>>45374319 #>>45374443 #>>45374448 #>>45374554 #>>45375003 #
AnonymousPlanet ◴[] No.45374001[source]
It could also mean "now that someone else has seen it, we can finally act on what we have only privately seen but couldn't admit seeing"
replies(1): >>45374154 #
scuff3d ◴[] No.45374154[source]
More likely MS was well aware of what was going on and didn't care until the Guardian forced their hand.
replies(1): >>45374205 #
ms7m ◴[] No.45374205[source]
> The disclosures caused alarm among senior Microsoft executives, sparking concerns that some of its Israel-based employees may not have been fully transparent about their knowledge of how Unit 8200 used Azure when questioned as part of the review.

Highly likely, or at least a bit naive -- Completely reasonable to have local staff for a contract this big, but Microsoft should have independently 'double-checked' sooner

replies(2): >>45374433 #>>45374931 #
1. lazide ◴[] No.45374931[source]
‘I’m shocked! shocked! that there is gambling in this establishment! This is unacceptable!’

‘Your winnings sir’