←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source
Show context
codeulike ◴[] No.45373831[source]
“I want to note our appreciation for the reporting of the Guardian,” [Microsoft’s vice-chair and president, Brad Smith] wrote, noting that it had brought to light “information we could not access in light of our customer privacy commitments”. He added: “Our review is ongoing.”

Its interesting that they seem to be saying they dont know the full details of how their customers are using Azure, due to privacy commitments.

replies(8): >>45374001 #>>45374241 #>>45374312 #>>45374319 #>>45374443 #>>45374448 #>>45374554 #>>45375003 #
williamdclt ◴[] No.45374241[source]
I don't know if it's _true_, but it seems right? I don't want Microsoft to have this level of visibility into my usage of Azure, just like I don't want my phone provider to eavesdrop on my conversations. I'm no privacy ayatollah, but this seems like a reasonable amount of privacy from Microsoft
replies(2): >>45374654 #>>45374682 #
madaxe_again ◴[] No.45374682[source]
Privacy ayatollah? Is that like an infosec shah?
replies(4): >>45374840 #>>45374898 #>>45374902 #>>45375409 #
1. lazide ◴[] No.45374898[source]
Data pope?
replies(1): >>45375853 #
2. thewebguyd ◴[] No.45375853[source]
Thanks for this one, putting in request to my manager to change my job title to data pope, since our titles are all meaningless anyway might as well have a fun one.