←back to thread

873 points helsinkiandrew | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.426s | source
Show context
tiahura ◴[] No.45373783[source]
A little more surveillance might have prevented Oct 7.
replies(8): >>45373877 #>>45373879 #>>45373903 #>>45373965 #>>45374053 #>>45374171 #>>45375924 #>>45383752 #
n1b0m ◴[] No.45373877[source]
A lack of surveillance wasn’t the problem. It was not believing the intelligence.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/28/israeli-milita...

replies(1): >>45374158 #
1. mrits ◴[] No.45374158[source]
Such a Monday quarterback's perspective. There is always plenty of intelligence to suggest there will be an attack
replies(1): >>45374340 #
2. yamazakiwi ◴[] No.45374340[source]
The amount of intelligence to suggest there will be an attack on specific places at specific times is contextual and not comparably equal.

Every time I hear or read that expression, I stop taking the comment seriously because it attempts to shut down dialogue with a cute, esoteric phrase instead of fostering a discussion about a serious retrospective.