←back to thread

245 points voxadam | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
umvi ◴[] No.45340842[source]
This... seems like it has the makings of a really great idea. So often prisoners are repeat offenders because they have no skills, no support system after getting out of prison so they revert to their old ways. Imagine already having a job and a large nest egg in your savings account because you got a remote job in prison. Or imagine going to prison as an 18-year-old, learning some skills through a prison educational system, and then getting a remote job and actually start contributing back to society. I'm not sure about Maine's implementation specifically, but something about this idea resonates strongly with me.
replies(1): >>45341167 #
terminalshort ◴[] No.45341167[source]
Yeah, I guess it's a good idea given the state of our current system. But it seems like prisoners fall into two basic categories - 1. people who very few employers would hire for remote work due to their criminal history. 2. people who really shouldn't be in prison at all.
replies(3): >>45343027 #>>45343859 #>>45345371 #
1. danaris ◴[] No.45345371[source]
> 1. people who very few employers would hire for remote work due to their criminal history.

Putting aside the widespread reflexive discrimination against "criminals", I would think that most people in prison who someone might think twice about hiring due to their criminal history would get a second look if it was for a remote job.

Someone working remotely can't rob or murder you, nor can they try to sell you drugs without a much more elaborate setup.

Seems to me the only kinds of people in prison that most employers might justly hesitate to hire for a remote job are white-collar criminals.

replies(1): >>45345436 #
2. delichon ◴[] No.45345436[source]
They can still do real damage. When hiring criminals be prepared for them to act like criminals.

https://www.corrections1.com/investigations/ga-inmate-accuse...

https://www.wltx.com/article/news/crime/south-carolina-inmat...

replies(1): >>45346084 #
3. danaris ◴[] No.45346084[source]
...and those are both, exactly as I said, white-collar criminals.