←back to thread

1041 points mpweiher | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.524s | source
Show context
medlazik ◴[] No.45225462[source]
Uranium mining isn't clean at all. Between Greenpeace (full of business school hacks) and lobby pressured EU courts, there's a middle ground.
replies(3): >>45225584 #>>45225589 #>>45225770 #
acidburnNSA ◴[] No.45225589[source]
What do you mean? Modern in situ uranium mining is one of the lowest impact mining of resources we have. It's not perfectly clean, but it's pretty darn good.
replies(1): >>45225667 #
medlazik ◴[] No.45225667[source]
>What do you mean?

I mean it's not clean

>one of the lowest impact mining of resources we have

Not the point. It's not clean, it shouldn't be called clean end of the story.

replies(5): >>45225768 #>>45225796 #>>45225799 #>>45225919 #>>45226522 #
stonemetal12 ◴[] No.45225919[source]
Then what is clean? By that definition Solar and Wind aren't because copper and iron mines aren't clean.
replies(1): >>45225997 #
1. KaseKun ◴[] No.45226412[source]
Now now, there are words that you can say to make your point that don't make you seem deranged.