Pretty massive implications for public health.
I wrote about some of the science behind on-the-wrist blood pressure monitoring and public health implications here:
https://www.empirical.health/blog/apple-watch-blood-pressure...
Every time I go to the doctor and they hook me up to a blood pressure monitor, it comes back way high (like 160/90). I then request a manual check and it always comes back normal. I didn't figure this out until after they prescribed me calcium channel blockers (and they didn't do anything). Something about the shape of my arm or something.
Anyway point being that a faulty reading led to me being prescribed meds I did not need. Hoping this doesn't lead to more of the same.
Seems like lawyer speak for "please don't sue us if we get this wrong" but I suspect the ad campaign for this feature will suggest otherwise.
The breathing disturbances notifications work in a similar way. They alert you to potential sleep apnea, but then you need to do an at-home or in-lab sleep study in order to get a diagnosis.
Is that how we sibsidize the advertized cost of $1500 down to $200
It's actually cheaper for me to go to one of these labs than to talk to a doctor and deal with insurance.
I always end up with my arm almost shoulder height resting on some bin on the side of the blood pressure device cart thing.
I wonder why they can't use an ergonomic chair with two appropriate-height support arms.
Of course. The purpose of this feature is to tell the right people that they might have a problem, and that they should ask a doctor about it - just like they've done in the past with AFib detection.
Your doctor should see it though, unless they don't stay next to you and thus can't (but I know mine use it more like a first control test, and would always do a manual test before prescribing anything).
YMMV, I'm in France.
PS : with that said, this here is even more different since it's in a watch, and I would not trust it for anything other than "hey, maybe go check at a doctor"