// You are responsible for releasing the structure in the end
arrow_array.release(&arrow_array);
This doesn't look like RAII. How is this idiomatic for C++20? Why do you have to pass a pointer to "this" again as an explicit argument.It's not how you interact with the data in your own C++ code, it's for passing this data to other in-process consumers (libraries etc). While in the example it calls the release function, this is usually just passed to a downstream consumer and it's their responsibility to call it.
I agree that having such an example as the first one is confusing. Given that a large part of the point of Apache Arrow is passing data columnar data between libraries in different languages in memory, it makes some sense.
And I'm glad there's a good C++ impl too.
This seems like a strange rationalizations when you don't need to have explicit release to be able to pass it to something else.