←back to thread

506 points Terretta | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.884s | source
Show context
NitpickLawyer ◴[] No.45066063[source]
Tested this yesterday with Cline. It's fast, works well with agentic flows, and produces decent code. No idea why this thread is so negative (also got flagged while I was typing this?) but it's a decent model. I'd say it's at or above gpt5-mini level, which is awesome in my book (I've been maining gpt5-mini for a few weeks now, does the job on a budget).

Things I noted:

- It's fast. I tested it in EU tz, so ymmv

- It does agentic in an interesting way. Instead of editing a file whole or in many places, it does many small passes.

- Had a feature take ~110k tokens (parsing html w/ bs4). Still finished the task. Didn't notice any problems at high context.

- When things didn't work first try, it created a new file to test, did all the mocking / testing there, and then once it worked edited the main module file. Nice. GPT5-mini would often times edit working files, and then get confused and fail the task.

All in all, not bad. At the price point it's at, I could see it as a daily driver. Even agentic stuff w/ opus + gpt5 high as planners and this thing as an implementer. It's fast enough that it might be worth setting it up in parallel and basically replicate pass@x from research.

IMO it's good to have options at every level. Having many providers fight for the market is good, it keeps them on their toes, and brings prices down. GPT5-mini is at 2$/MTok, this is at 1.5$/MTok. This is basically "free", in the great scheme of things. I ndon't get the negativity.

replies(10): >>45066728 #>>45067116 #>>45067311 #>>45067436 #>>45067602 #>>45067936 #>>45068543 #>>45068653 #>>45068788 #>>45074597 #
dlachausse ◴[] No.45066728[source]
> No idea why this thread is so negative (also got flagged while I was typing this?)

Grok is owned by Elon Musk. Anything positive that is even tangentially related to him will be treated negatively by certain people here. Additionally, it is an AI coding tool which is seen as a threat to some people’s livelihoods here. It’s a double whammy, so I’m not surprised by the reaction to it at all.

replies(4): >>45066775 #>>45066877 #>>45066985 #>>45067004 #
1. Fidelix ◴[] No.45067055[source]
It would probably beneficial for you to distinguish an is from an ought.

The OP was descriptive, not prescriptive.

replies(1): >>45068461 #
2. jjangkke ◴[] No.45068461[source]
How strange, you've logged in after 30+ days just to post this comment
replies(1): >>45071002 #
3. jacquesm ◴[] No.45071002{3}[source]
How strange, your account is only twice as old.