←back to thread

361 points gloxkiqcza | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.046s | source
Show context
pharos92 ◴[] No.45007882[source]
From my perspective, this is born out of NGO's and political elite. This is not an ask from or concern of the general population.
replies(5): >>45008069 #>>45009492 #>>45009599 #>>45010944 #>>45017246 #
1. einpoklum ◴[] No.45011481[source]
1. "Parents of children", unfortunately, have little political clout (also when including their votes).

2. Children are not "fucked up" by seeing people having sex. I mean, ok, parents can be worried about them being "fucked up", but this is to a great extent the same engineering-of-consciousness that the TF article is discussing, and which the UK government wishes to affect.

2. csmattryder ◴[] No.45011551[source]
>And the parents that are worried about their children getting fucked up by hardcore porn and social media.

Rarely brought up during the OSA debate, but I think we all know every UK ISP has "Safety Shield" on to block access to adult entertainment - by default. When purchasing the service you're asked if you want it disabled.

If parents are disabling it, they can't be that worried.

3. djrj477dhsnv ◴[] No.45011974[source]
> children getting fucked up by hardcore porn

What evidence do you have that this is a reasonable concern?

I've seen plenty of hard-core porn since the age of 10 and turned out just fine. I don't know anyone in my generation that has said otherwise.

replies(1): >>45013051 #
4. antonymoose ◴[] No.45013051[source]
I know plenty of lifelong smokers who lack cancer, so it’s fine then?

In any case, if we’re to share anecdotes, I don’t have a single man I know that has said “wow, pornography has enriched my childhood / adult life.” I know plenty that have had trouble in their relationships, however.

replies(1): >>45013909 #
5. ◴[] No.45013909{3}[source]