←back to thread

875 points freedomben | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
miiiiiike ◴[] No.44611570[source]
Look. Ignore the content. Why the fuck do we allow credit card companies have a say in how we spend our money?

Fraud? Abuse? Fine, let me put cash onto a card and if that card gets stolen, oh well, my loss. Mastercard should have no say in what what speech is considered acceptable outside of their offices. We don't care what execs at a water company think? Why do we care about the people at Mastercard?

replies(7): >>44611601 #>>44611910 #>>44612123 #>>44613420 #>>44613595 #>>44616221 #>>44619373 #
hungmung ◴[] No.44611601[source]
It's because Visa got sued, lost, and it was found out they knowingly processed payments for illegal adult content, so they basically avoid the sector entirely now. Economist had an article about it maybe two years ago and came to much the same conclusion you did. IIRC, the failure in their mind was government not stepping in to make a law so things are less ambiguous in the future. Now payment processing cos get to gate keep people's speech, which means everything is basically a civil suit away from getting blacklisted.
replies(3): >>44614859 #>>44616171 #>>44617959 #
1. aranelsurion ◴[] No.44616171[source]
I wonder what are the odds of Visa being succesfully sued for processing payments to such a huge brand like Steam.

Steam has its virtual wallet and marketplace as well, so Visa is twice removed from where the money will actually go once it enters Steam ecosystem.

Even as an abundance of caution, this doesn’t make sense to me.