(www.pcgamer.com)

788 points freedomben | 1 comments | 18 Jul 25 15:54 UTC | HN request time: 0.223s | source

Show context

Aeolun ◴[19 Jul 25 02:54 UTC] No.44612148[source]▶

I think it’s hilarious we allow stuff like Postal or Soldier of Fortune without a question, where the whole focus is on going crazy and murdering a whole bunch of people.

But try to show a sensual human body, instead of one that’s ripped into small pieces, and oh my god, this is going too far!

replies(15): >>44612196 #>>44612493 #>>44612540 #>>44612587 #>>44612722 #>>44612753 #>>44612792 #>>44612908 #>>44613041 #>>44613091 #>>44613113 #>>44613117 #>>44615781 #>>44615907 #>>44616264 #

1. martin-t ◴[19 Jul 25 14:48 UTC] No.44615907[source]▶

>>44612148 #

I agree with the fact there is hypocricy. I disagree that either should be banned. (Maybe you didn't mean it that way but somebody with us the argument that way)

If group A wants to control group or person B, they should prove with very high certainty that group B's behavior is harmful to someone who is not B.

↑

Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to delist certain adult games