←back to thread

817 points freedomben | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.002s | source
Show context
throwaway071625 ◴[] No.44607246[source]
The article calls out “certain adult games” which is vague. It is interesting to note that most of the delisted games were themed specifically around incest.

https://bsky.app/profile/steamdb.info/post/3lu32vdlsmg27

Wondering if this will be a slippery slope towards pulling more anodyne stuff.

replies(11): >>44608168 #>>44610963 #>>44610989 #>>44611220 #>>44611262 #>>44611429 #>>44611739 #>>44611804 #>>44612279 #>>44613185 #>>44613514 #
eddythompson80 ◴[] No.44610963[source]
Specifically incest, rape, and child abuse-themed games.
replies(2): >>44611519 #>>44612353 #
superkuh ◴[] No.44611519[source]
Ah, like a video game version of "Game of Thrones"? None of the payment processors had any issues with taking money for that series. And that was live action.
replies(1): >>44611552 #
eddythompson80 ◴[] No.44611552[source]
Yep, those games were exactly the same thing as Game of Thrones.
replies(1): >>44611635 #
ggoo ◴[] No.44611635[source]
I mean by the content they were yeah. Precisely the problem with rules declaring what content is and isn’t acceptable.
replies(1): >>44611749 #
eddythompson80 ◴[] No.44611749[source]
Exactly. By content, here is a book on Amazon[1] where the author openly tells stories of rape and incest and somehow it's all Ok. Pretty much the same as Game of Thrones and those Steam games.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Body-Keeps-Score-Healing-Trauma/dp/01...

replies(1): >>44612078 #
ggoo ◴[] No.44612078[source]
Seems like we’re in agreement - I read your prior comment differently
replies(1): >>44613303 #
baobabKoodaa ◴[] No.44613303[source]
You are not in agreement. The person you are replying to is being sarcastic. They feel that a HBO produced tv show with incest is art that needs to be protected while an indie dev game with incest is trash that needs to be censored.
replies(1): >>44615095 #
mango7283 ◴[] No.44615095[source]
The fact of the matter is you will find more people willing to publicly bat for GOT than you will find people willing to bat for an "indie incest non-con game". And it's not like GOT has not received criticism for its content or that people haven't tried.
replies(1): >>44615136 #
baobabKoodaa ◴[] No.44615136[source]
The movements here (the pro-censorship movement & the anti-sexuality movement) are mainly driven by religious beliefs, and as such, it comes as no surprise that they do not want to apply censorship in a fair or even logically consistent way; they merely want to ban things they personally do not like.
replies(1): >>44615188 #
1. mango7283 ◴[] No.44615188[source]
As I pointed out earlier, it's also valid that they are savvy enough to pick their battles and divide and conquer - you can't take down a critical mainstream success like GOT or GTA, but you can go after fringe games with content most people would be uncomfortable publicly defending.
replies(2): >>44616212 #>>44617799 #
2. baobabKoodaa ◴[] No.44616212[source]
Sure, I can see that being part of it (I didn't see this implication in your earlier post)
replies(1): >>44616844 #
3. mango7283 ◴[] No.44616844[source]
Ah sorry I meant elsewhere in the thread
4. choo-t ◴[] No.44617799[source]
The very same group did try to take down GTA V : https://www.collectiveshout.org/prostitution_survivors_call_...