←back to thread

293 points dataflow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
reverendsteveii ◴[] No.44604806[source]
>bypassed ban

Broke the law is the phrase we want here. They did an illegal thing. They didn't just scoot past a barrier, they violated people's rights.

replies(3): >>44604863 #>>44604877 #>>44605090 #
gruez ◴[] No.44604863[source]
>They didn't just scoot past a barrier, they violated people's rights.

Claiming that an administrative policy against using facial recognition as a "right" seems like a stretch.

replies(3): >>44604915 #>>44609713 #>>44614857 #
1. 93po ◴[] No.44614857[source]
You have a right to due process, which means operating within their defined laws and systems

That policy exists as a scape-goat to there not getting actual laws passed that would make it flatly illegal. This way they can prevent the real law, still break the rules, and get away with it