←back to thread

324 points rntn | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.36s | source
Show context
rockemsockem ◴[] No.44608323[source]
I'm surprised that most of the comments here are siding with Europe blindly?

Am I the only one who assumes by default that European regulation will be heavy-handed and ill conceived?

replies(13): >>44608340 #>>44608348 #>>44608365 #>>44608370 #>>44608610 #>>44608665 #>>44610625 #>>44610726 #>>44610798 #>>44612923 #>>44612936 #>>44614160 #>>44619905 #
notyourwork ◴[] No.44610625[source]
What is bad about heavy handed regulation to protect citizens?
replies(12): >>44610680 #>>44610707 #>>44611218 #>>44611228 #>>44611391 #>>44611511 #>>44611793 #>>44612262 #>>44614109 #>>44614142 #>>44614972 #>>44618703 #
marginalia_nu ◴[] No.44610707[source]
A good example of how this can end up with negative outcomes is the cookie directive, which is how we ended up with cookie consent popovers on every website that does absolutely nothing to prevent tracking and has only amounted to making lives more frustrating in the EU and abroad.

It was a decade too late and written by people who were incredibly out of touch with the actual problem. The GDPR is a bit better, but it's still a far bigger nuisance for regular European citizens than the companies that still largely unhindered track and profile the same.

replies(4): >>44611073 #>>44611156 #>>44611198 #>>44614724 #
1. thrance ◴[] No.44614724[source]
Bad argument, the solution is not to not regulate, it's to make a new law mandating companies to make cookies opt-in behind a menu that can't be a banner. And if this somehow backfires too, we go again. Giving up is not the solution to the privacy crisis.