←back to thread

258 points anigbrowl | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
jleyank ◴[] No.44611189[source]
It's really depressing how the US system seems to have existed "on belief". Once somebody set out to damage or destroy it, away it went. Pretty much without a whimper.

As I recall, the system was set up with 3 branches of government in tension. Obviously, that was naive.

replies(20): >>44611243 #>>44611251 #>>44611274 #>>44611292 #>>44611294 #>>44611300 #>>44611372 #>>44611468 #>>44612747 #>>44612970 #>>44613048 #>>44613100 #>>44613128 #>>44613243 #>>44613469 #>>44613869 #>>44615093 #>>44616024 #>>44616939 #>>44617655 #
lazide ◴[] No.44611251[source]
All systems exist ‘on belief’. And it’s objectively done better than all other known systems it has been running concurrently with (in both longevity and impact).
replies(2): >>44611271 #>>44612924 #
pinkmuffinere ◴[] No.44611271[source]
> it’s objectively done better than all other known systems (in longevity and impact)

I think the US is probably the country which has had the greatest positive impact on the world in the last 150 years (purely a personal opinion). But even so, we’ve only been around like 300 years total. It’s crazy to say that we have _objectively_ had the biggest and longest impact, when there are civilizations that existed for so much longer, and which made massive contributions to the world.

replies(1): >>44611321 #
lazide ◴[] No.44611321[source]
You might want to re-read my comment.

I made no such long term or meta claims.

replies(1): >>44611722 #
pinkmuffinere ◴[] No.44611722[source]
I guess I’m just missing it, I’ve re-read the thread and it still seems like you’re discussing the US? What am I missing? The parent comment you replied to is

> It's really depressing how the US system seems to have existed "on belief". Once somebody set out to damage or destroy it, away it went. Pretty much without a whimper. As I recall, the system was set up with 3 branches of government in tension. Obviously, that was naive.

replies(1): >>44611852 #
lazide ◴[] No.44611852[source]
‘systems it has been running concurrently with’. Aka during the same times.

What other gov’t during the same time period has lasted as long or longer (none that I am aware of), let alone has produced prosperity, etc. to the same extent?

And it isn’t actually gone yet, either.

replies(2): >>44613172 #>>44613573 #
andsoitis ◴[] No.44613172[source]
> What other gov’t during the same time period has lasted as long or longer (none that I am aware of), let alone has produced prosperity, etc. to the same extent?

The constitutional system of the United Kingdom is over 1000 years old.

replies(1): >>44613222 #
1. lazide ◴[] No.44613222[source]
There is no plausible entity arising from that arrangement that one could refer that has survived even 1/10th of that time intact. Not even counting the devolving of numerous other additional territories.

Including the Sovereign, or Parliament.

It has kept the title, but so has France and how many Republics are they on now?

replies(1): >>44613475 #
2. inejge ◴[] No.44613475[source]
> It has kept the title, but so has France and how many Republics are they on now?

The US has also kept the title of the Senate, but I'd argue that it's been a very different institution since the 17th Amendment. Also, the Federal govt. until the Great Depression was much more hands-off (witness the overuse of the Commerce Clause since then.)

I'm not sure that the Founders would think of the present-day Republic as the same as theirs.