←back to thread

800 points freedomben | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.258s | source
Show context
Aeolun ◴[] No.44612148[source]
I think it’s hilarious we allow stuff like Postal or Soldier of Fortune without a question, where the whole focus is on going crazy and murdering a whole bunch of people.

But try to show a sensual human body, instead of one that’s ripped into small pieces, and oh my god, this is going too far!

replies(15): >>44612196 #>>44612493 #>>44612540 #>>44612587 #>>44612722 #>>44612753 #>>44612792 #>>44612908 #>>44613041 #>>44613091 #>>44613113 #>>44613117 #>>44615781 #>>44615907 #>>44616264 #
tempodox ◴[] No.44612587[source]
Same with movies. Piles of dead bodies are OK for children to watch but naked skin would be highly damaging.
replies(2): >>44612898 #>>44613060 #
TheOtherHobbes[dead post] ◴[] No.44613060[source]
[flagged]
1. philwelch ◴[] No.44613142[source]
> Republicans literally argue it's better for the country to have school shooters and for survivors and parents to live with PTSD for the rest of their lives than to limit access to military-grade weapons.

Can you quote any Republican who has “literally argued” this or are you just spreading lies that make it easier for you to vilify and dehumanize people who disagree with you politically?