←back to thread

728 points freedomben | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.307s | source
Show context
bji9jhff ◴[] No.44607275[source]
It is sad that in 2025 this needs to be repeated: fiction is not real.

This statement imply that:

* Simulated violence is not violence.

* Simulated sex is not sex.

* Simulated sorcery is not sorcery

replies(5): >>44610770 #>>44610853 #>>44610937 #>>44610996 #>>44611197 #
nkrisc ◴[] No.44610770[source]
And yet it is possible to make simulations extreme enough I would not opposed to banning them. There are some things that should not be normalized in society.

It shouldn’t be payment processors doing it unilaterally, I’ll grant that. But I’m not (and I’m sure a great many more of a silent majority) wholly opposed to the outcome.

replies(6): >>44610823 #>>44610871 #>>44611304 #>>44612372 #>>44612549 #>>44616443 #
1. Dilettante_ ◴[] No.44612549[source]
There is a world of nuance separating "normalizing" and "banning" something though, that's simply a false dichotomy.

I'd wager most "normal" people would recoil at the idea of eating excrement and, for all my open-mindedness, it's probably not something I'd actively endorse. But banning it is on a whole other leaf. Things can and should be allowed to exist on the fringe.

Otherwise we're moving towards the subject of the T.S. Eliot quote where "everything that is not forbidden will be compulsory, and everything not compulsory will be forbidden."