←back to thread

339 points throw0101c | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.487s | source
Show context
jonas21 ◴[] No.44609857[source]
I don't know... 1.2% of GDP just doesn't seem that extreme to me. Certainly nowhere near "eating the economy" level compared to other transformative technologies or programs like:

- Apollo program: 4%

- Railroads: 6% (mentioned by the author)

- Covid stimulus: 27%

- WW2 defense: 40%

replies(18): >>44609903 #>>44609914 #>>44609929 #>>44609942 #>>44609978 #>>44610058 #>>44610176 #>>44610526 #>>44610627 #>>44610705 #>>44610847 #>>44611010 #>>44611147 #>>44611151 #>>44611385 #>>44612266 #>>44612358 #>>44614934 #
1. mycall ◴[] No.44612358[source]
> WW2 defense: 40%

Do you think WW3 defense should be on the charts yet?

replies(1): >>44613009 #
2. lostlogin ◴[] No.44613009[source]
Given that defence spending is hovering around 2.0-2.5% of GDP, I don't think we are there yet.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS