←back to thread

293 points rntn | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.906s | source | bottom
1. isodev ◴[] No.44612241[source]
As a citizen I’m perfectly happy with the AI Act. As a “person in tech”, the kind of growth being “stunt” here shouldn’t be happening in the first place. It’s not overreach to put some guardrails and protect humans from the overreaching ideas of the techbro elite.
replies(2): >>44612269 #>>44614631 #
2. Aeolun ◴[] No.44612269[source]
As a techbro elite. I find it incredibly annoying when people regulate shit that ‘could’ be used for something bad (and many good things), instead of regulating someone actually using it for something bad.
replies(1): >>44612347 #
3. isodev ◴[] No.44612347[source]
You’re too focused on the “regulate” part. It’s a lot easier to see it as a framework. It spells out what you need to anticipate the spirit of the law and what’s considerate good or bad practice.

If you actually read it, you will also realise it’s entirely comprised of “common sense”. Like, you wouldn’t want to do the stuff it says are not to be done anyway. Remember, corps can’t be trusted because they have a business to run. So that’s why when humans can be exposed to risky AI applications, the EU says the model provider needs to be transparent and demonstrate they’re capable of operating a model safely.

4. tim333 ◴[] No.44614631[source]
A problem with the EU over regulating from its citizens point of view is the AI companies will set up elsewhere and the EU will become a backwater.
replies(1): >>44616170 #
5. 0xDEAFBEAD ◴[] No.44616170[source]
Yep, that's why they need to regulate ASML. Tell ASML they can only service 'compliant' foundries, where 'compliant' foundry means 'only sells to compliant datacenters/AI firms'.
replies(1): >>44617392 #
6. daedrdev ◴[] No.44617392{3}[source]
Thats how you get every government to throw money at any competitor to ASML and try to steal their IP.