←back to thread

339 points throw0101c | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.413s | source
Show context
jonas21 ◴[] No.44609857[source]
I don't know... 1.2% of GDP just doesn't seem that extreme to me. Certainly nowhere near "eating the economy" level compared to other transformative technologies or programs like:

- Apollo program: 4%

- Railroads: 6% (mentioned by the author)

- Covid stimulus: 27%

- WW2 defense: 40%

replies(18): >>44609903 #>>44609914 #>>44609929 #>>44609942 #>>44609978 #>>44610058 #>>44610176 #>>44610526 #>>44610627 #>>44610705 #>>44610847 #>>44611010 #>>44611147 #>>44611151 #>>44611385 #>>44612266 #>>44612358 #>>44614934 #
kulahan ◴[] No.44609929[source]
As a % of GDP it doesn’t seem very large, but that’s because our GDP is so massive. This is still an entire Norway’s worth of GDP.

Like 1.2% isn’t a big percentage, but neither is 3.4% - our total military expenditures this year.

replies(2): >>44610441 #>>44610549 #
noosphr ◴[] No.44610549[source]
The entire population of Norway fits in Queens and Brooklyn. If everyone there decided to whittle spoons we'd be midly concerned about just what got in their water, but it won't be an existential crisis for the rest of us.

I will never understand people who use tiny European countries as meaningful comparisons to continent sized ones.

replies(1): >>44611893 #
1. kulahan ◴[] No.44611893[source]
It helps people understand scale, since there is only one other kinda similar economic machine, and it's China. The EU is too loosely coordinated to really compare.

The population of Queens and Brooklyn is one of the most densely populated areas on the planet. I will never understand people who use massively outlier-sized cities as meaningful comparisons to nations.

replies(1): >>44614161 #
2. corimaith ◴[] No.44614161[source]
Queens and Brooklyn are not outliers on the global scale. Most Asian countries has similar population densities if not higher. It's really the small cities in Europe that are the outliers here.