←back to thread

71 points kristianp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.23s | source
Show context
extr ◴[] No.44611097[source]
Have been using this for awhile, I'm on the $100/mo Max plan and have been running $600-800/mo in terms of usage, and I'm hardly pushing it to the limits (missing lots of billing windows).

It makes me wonder what Anthropic's true margins are. I could believe they are overcharging via the API, Sonnet is $3/$15/Mtok and Opus at an ABSURD $15/$75/Mtok. But to break even for me, that would mean that they're overcharging by a factor 5x-10x, which doesn't seem possible. Is the music going to stop for Claude Code the same way it did for Cursor? I have to imagine every incentive in the world is pushing them to lower inference cost rather than introduce stricter limits, and unlike Cursor they can actually can reach into their stack and do this. But I'm not sure they're capable of miracles.

Regardless, I'm bullish Anthropic. Sonnet and Opus don't benchmark as well as O3/Grok4 at pure coding, and aren't as cheap as Kimi K2 for theoretically similar perf, but as any user knows they are top tier at instruction following, highly reliable and predictable, and have a certain intangible theory of mind that is unique to Anthropic.

replies(5): >>44611164 #>>44611202 #>>44611353 #>>44611401 #>>44611566 #
sothatsit ◴[] No.44611353[source]
> but as any user knows they are top tier at instruction following, highly reliable and predictable

This is spot on. Reliability is really the #1 priority for me when it comes to coding agents, and Sonnet, and especially Opus, really deliver on it. It makes such a huge difference when it comes to agents. Anthropic really nailed it on this.

My process has become: get Opus to generate a plan, use o3 to help me review the plan, and then get Opus to implement the plan. This works extremely well for me, and is the first time where I've felt AI being actually useful for coding anything more than small prototypes.

replies(1): >>44611462 #
buremba ◴[] No.44611462[source]
How do you switch to o3 to review the plan?
replies(5): >>44611563 #>>44611676 #>>44611687 #>>44612691 #>>44616963 #
1. sothatsit ◴[] No.44611687[source]
I have a workflow that tells Claude Code to generate a planning markdown document: https://gist.github.com/Sothatsit/c9fcbcb50445ebb6f367b0a6ca...