←back to thread

EPA says it will eliminate its scientific research arm

(www.nytimes.com)
241 points anigbrowl | 4 comments | 18 Jul 25 23:00 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
vjvjvjvjghv[dead post] ◴[18 Jul 25 23:13 UTC] No.44610841[source]▶
[flagged]
riveralabs ◴[18 Jul 25 23:56 UTC] No.44611169[source]▶
There’s not a lot the opposition can do. Elections have consequences and now people are gonna have to live with it. People stayed home or decided to vote against their own interest. It’s not like there wasn’t a previous track record to compare. Selective amnesia is not an excuse.
replies(2): >>44611245 #>>44611384 #
Alupis ◴[19 Jul 25 00:08 UTC] No.44611245[source]▶
Frankly, the Democratic party epically and massively failed their constituency by first running a mummy and then attempting to run perhaps the most unlikable, unrelatable, disconnected candidate of my lifetime - that literally zero people voted for.

It's not the people's fault, it's the party's... the party thought everyone would just jump when told to do so.

Democrats deserve better.

replies(3): >>44611408 #>>44611491 #>>44611595 #
1. jfengel ◴[19 Jul 25 00:46 UTC] No.44611491[source]▶
Seventy million people voted for her.
replies(3): >>44611524 #>>44611575 #>>44612041 #
2. rockemsockem ◴[19 Jul 25 00:52 UTC] No.44611524[source]▶
I voted for her, but I didn't do it because I *wanted* her.
3. Alupis ◴[19 Jul 25 01:03 UTC] No.44611575[source]▶
In the primary? No... 70 million people were forced to vote for her in the general. That's why Democrats lost this election.

It's comments like yours that make it really seem like the Democrat Party hasn't learned a damn thing from this ordeal.

4. vjvjvjvjghv ◴[19 Jul 25 02:30 UTC] No.44612041[source]▶
I don’t think it was “for” her. Most votes against Trump.