←back to thread

713 points freedomben | 10 comments | | HN request time: 0.779s | source | bottom
Show context
bji9jhff ◴[] No.44607275[source]
It is sad that in 2025 this needs to be repeated: fiction is not real.

This statement imply that:

* Simulated violence is not violence.

* Simulated sex is not sex.

* Simulated sorcery is not sorcery

replies(5): >>44610770 #>>44610853 #>>44610937 #>>44610996 #>>44611197 #
nkrisc ◴[] No.44610770[source]
And yet it is possible to make simulations extreme enough I would not opposed to banning them. There are some things that should not be normalized in society.

It shouldn’t be payment processors doing it unilaterally, I’ll grant that. But I’m not (and I’m sure a great many more of a silent majority) wholly opposed to the outcome.

replies(6): >>44610823 #>>44610871 #>>44611304 #>>44612372 #>>44612549 #>>44616443 #
1. cool_dude85 ◴[] No.44611304[source]
For the people who disagree: would you really be interested in seeing Child Grooming Simulator 25 on steam? I think we can almost all reasonably agree that at least this sort of content should not be sold on there.
replies(4): >>44611339 #>>44611979 #>>44611991 #>>44616136 #
2. krustyburger ◴[] No.44611339[source]
Won’t somebody please think of the children?
replies(2): >>44611399 #>>44612364 #
3. cool_dude85 ◴[] No.44611399[source]
When we start saying "no content restrictions besides illegal stuff", your hyperbolic question becomes legitimate in a way that it's not when we're talking about Doom.
4. Shekelphile ◴[] No.44611979[source]
there are already hundreds, if not thousands of anime lolicon porn games on steam.

the people making a stink about this know this but are pretending that they don't because it would overtly out them as pedophiles.

replies(2): >>44613284 #>>44613323 #
5. uamgeoalsk ◴[] No.44611991[source]
I don't have to be "interested" in seeing something on steam to disagree with nkrisc. I don't care about 99.9%+ of the games on steam, that doesn't mean I want them gone.
6. Dracophoenix ◴[] No.44612364[source]
Correction: Won't somebody please think of the pixels?
7. Thorrez ◴[] No.44613284[source]
Are you saying the people who are petitioning Steam to remove porn games are playing the porn games themselves and simultaneously pretending porn games don't exist on Steam?

That doesn't make sense.

replies(1): >>44615138 #
8. baobabKoodaa ◴[] No.44613323[source]
Nothing you said here is true.
9. mango7283 ◴[] No.44615138{3}[source]
It's possible he means people saying steam should not delist anything due to pressure from activists are tacitly condoning sketchy lolicon games.
10. Levitz ◴[] No.44616136[source]
>would you really be interested in seeing Child Grooming Simulator 25 on steam?

If we are going down this path there's a lot of literature popular with women about to be banned