←back to thread

Broadcom to discontinue free Bitnami Helm charts

(github.com)
210 points mmoogle | 1 comments | 18 Jul 25 19:29 UTC | HN request time: 0.284s | source
Show context
ntqz ◴[18 Jul 25 19:39 UTC] No.44608949[source]▶
I could see the writing on the wall with this.

On that note, I'm already looking at migrating my codebase off of Spring. Just testing the waters with Quarkus, Helidon, Micronaut, Pekko, Vert.x, and plain Jakarta EE right now.

replies(3): >>44609703 #>>44610521 #>>44611297 #
_1tan ◴[18 Jul 25 20:52 UTC] No.44609703[source]▶
Are there any indications or just a feel?
replies(1): >>44609844 #
bags43 ◴[18 Jul 25 21:07 UTC] No.44609844[source]▶
Company where I work had huge risk audit.

The second highest risk is using USA based cloud with 66/100.

The first one was using Spring Boot everywhere 77/100. Till the end of 2025 we need to have migration path to something else with 2 PoCs done.

replies(4): >>44609971 #>>44610952 #>>44611105 #>>44611548 #
jchmbrln ◴[18 Jul 25 21:21 UTC] No.44609971[source]▶
I’m completely out of the loop. What’s going on with Spring Boot?
replies(2): >>44610003 #>>44610074 #
radicalbyte ◴[18 Jul 25 21:24 UTC] No.44610003[source]▶
The VMware apocalypse.
replies(1): >>44610028 #
heisenbit ◴[18 Jul 25 21:27 UTC] No.44610028[source]▶
One does not need VMware for SpringBoot so?
replies(3): >>44610087 #>>44610088 #>>44610090 #
loloquwowndueo ◴[18 Jul 25 21:35 UTC] No.44610090[source]▶
Not spring boot, but spring, is owned by VMware. Sure spring is under a free license but if upstream enshittifies, community forks would be required.
replies(2): >>44611037 #>>44614624 #
1. mindcrime ◴[18 Jul 25 23:36 UTC] No.44611037[source]▶
And as popular and widely used as Spring is, that would 100% happen. To me at least, I wouldn't count this as a particularly huge risk. But in an enterprise setting, with mandatory auditing and stuff, I can understand why there would be a requirement to at least pre-identify alternative(s).