←back to thread

713 points freedomben | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
timpera ◴[] No.44606574[source]
Considering their volume, I find it hard to believe that Valve couldn't find another, more lenient payment processor with similar fees.
replies(6): >>44606597 #>>44606628 #>>44606650 #>>44606747 #>>44606777 #>>44608711 #
astura ◴[] No.44606650[source]
Adult content has a high chargeback rate and high fraud rates so payment processing for adult content has higher fees.
replies(4): >>44606688 #>>44606780 #>>44606910 #>>44606926 #
AIPedant ◴[] No.44606910[source]
The fact that these were specifically incest games makes me think a title was somehow involved in distributing CSAM, which is often why Visa/MC crack down on porn websites.

But it is possible that Visa sensibly and correctly said "anyone who makes or purchases such a game is a despicable scumbag, and we shouldn't assume the financial risk of dealing with them."

replies(2): >>44607221 #>>44610919 #
1. mitthrowaway2 ◴[] No.44610919[source]
I think the government should be the one deciding what makes someone qualify as a despicable scumbag, not a private payment processor that is essentially acting as a utility provider. For the same reason, I also don't think an electric company should be allowed to shut cancel your building's electricity if they don't like your mismatched socks.