←back to thread

339 points throw0101c | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
jonas21 ◴[] No.44609857[source]
I don't know... 1.2% of GDP just doesn't seem that extreme to me. Certainly nowhere near "eating the economy" level compared to other transformative technologies or programs like:

- Apollo program: 4%

- Railroads: 6% (mentioned by the author)

- Covid stimulus: 27%

- WW2 defense: 40%

replies(18): >>44609903 #>>44609914 #>>44609929 #>>44609942 #>>44609978 #>>44610058 #>>44610176 #>>44610526 #>>44610627 #>>44610705 #>>44610847 #>>44611010 #>>44611147 #>>44611151 #>>44611385 #>>44612266 #>>44612358 #>>44614934 #
ivape[dead post] ◴[] No.44610058[source]
[flagged]
simianparrot ◴[] No.44610094[source]
Please tell me this is satire. Surely you can’t honestly mean this, but these days with AI Poe’s law is way too strong.
replies(2): >>44610126 #>>44610397 #
1. ivape ◴[] No.44610397[source]
You think the world does a good job educating people? I’m very serious about making that wholesale change. Many are functionally illiterate and never reach sophisticated academic levels. Many don’t even have parents at home that are qualified to supplement them. Many have teachers who absolutely will never be able to extract their potential. Many are in environments where our current education paradigms will never be able to overcome. LLMs will save a generation of kids.