←back to thread

79 points hmkoyan | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.266s | source

I've been working on librari.io for the past several months and just launched the beta version.

The Problem: I have 500+ books across multiple rooms in my house and was desperately looking for an app to manage them properly. Most library management apps are either too basic or designed for institutional libraries with rigid workflows that don't fit personal use.

What I Built:

- Multiple libraries: manage collections in different locations

- Location tracking - remember exactly which shelf each book is on

- Loan management - track books you've lent to friends

- Custom fields & tags - store any additional book info the way YOU think about them

- Reading progress tracking - dates, duration, personal ratings

- Modern UI/UX - clean & actually enjoyable to use

Current Status:

- Beta version live

- Working on improving the responsiveness of the app and addressing initial user feedback

Would love feedback! Especially curious about:

- What features would make YOU actually use a library management app?

- UI/UX feedback always welcome

- Any book collectors here who'd be interested in beta testing?

Looking forward to your thoughts! Thank you in advance.

1. jrussino ◴[] No.44610278[source]
I just want a simple/quick/easy way to scan all of the books in my house and print spine labels like the ones they use in a library.

Dewey decimal or Library of Congress or whatever. We just have too many books (mainly children's books) and I want an easy low-thought/low-friction way to identify exactly where each book should be put away.

Would this help with my problem? Is there already a solution for this?

> Most library management apps are either too basic or designed for institutional libraries with rigid workflows that don't fit personal use.

That what I concluded after a cursory search of this space as well.

replies(1): >>44611806 #
2. giraffe_lady ◴[] No.44611806[source]
Library of congress system is way too much for a home library, you occupy the categories so sparsely that it feels basically arbitrary. It is arguably like this even for small municipal and branch libraries.

Dewey is better but most people's personal libraries will be really heavy on a couple of the classes, light on another couple, the rest close to non-existent. So you still end up having to have a system to organize the class you have the most of, the dewey subclasses are still too fine-grained for a home library, and you have the LoC system problem again.

My spouse is a former librarian and we have a few thousand books between us, across a few rooms. What we do is each bookcase roughly corresponds to a dewey class or two, we try to avoid any one shelf having more than one subject. After that it's just by spine color. You'd be surprised how well this works! It's easy enough for kids to find and place books by color, and the visual sense memory works great for finding stuff. Every once in a while it'll throw you, "I swear this book was green" but whatever it mostly works.

Another thing that we don't do but could be fun is just to buy a set of the genre stickers that some libraries put on the spine.