←back to thread

279 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
mikert89 ◴[] No.44609276[source]
The big secret is that they could detect cancer very early in most people, but the health care companies don't want to pay for the screening. You can pay out of pocket for these procedures. I was told this by a cancer researcher

EDIT:

Adding these caveats:

1. There is a ton of nuance in the diagnosis, since most people have a small amount of cancer in their blood at all times

2. The screenings are 5-10k + follow up appointments to actually see if its real cancer

3. All in cost then could be much higher per person

4. These tests arent something that are currently produced to be used at mass scale

replies(7): >>44609315 #>>44609327 #>>44609340 #>>44609391 #>>44609453 #>>44609460 #>>44609781 #
melling ◴[] No.44609315[source]
Probably not true. It’s much cheaper to catch cancer early than to treat advanced cancer later
replies(3): >>44609371 #>>44609376 #>>44609700 #
vasco ◴[] No.44609700[source]
Yeah but then you'd go through life having biopsies all the time. If all people did a full body MRI almost everyone would have weird lumps that doctors would have to biopsy to be really sure, and then what do you do? Do you biopsy yourself every time some weird tissue appears? Most of those will be nothing and you'll be going through the complications of surgeries and anesthesia all the time just to always make sure.
replies(2): >>44609780 #>>44610064 #
1. cogman10 ◴[] No.44610064[source]
Assuming MRIs weren't exorbitantly expensive, then the answer would probably be to simply rescan a month or 2 later and biopsy the lumps that don't go away.