←back to thread

337 points throw0101c | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
oytis ◴[] No.44609364[source]
I just hope when (if) the hype is over, we can repurpose the capacities for something useful (e.g. drug discovery etc.)
replies(16): >>44609452 #>>44609461 #>>44609463 #>>44609471 #>>44609489 #>>44609580 #>>44609632 #>>44609635 #>>44609712 #>>44609785 #>>44609958 #>>44609979 #>>44610227 #>>44610522 #>>44610554 #>>44610755 #
barbazoo ◴[] No.44609635[source]
On the other hand, drug discovery sounds like it's a candidate for really benefitting from AI. To fuel AI model development, there maybe has to be all the garbage that comes with AI.
replies(1): >>44609674 #
lm28469 ◴[] No.44609674[source]
What drugs? The leading causes of death are routine induced, 80% of cancers are caused by your environment, &c.

We have much better things to do with these billions

replies(3): >>44609752 #>>44609813 #>>44610345 #
schmidtleonard ◴[] No.44609813[source]
Bullshit. Heart disease and cancer (and a long tail of medical problems) cook up with age and kill ~everyone inside ~100 years. If you think that environment and exercise can fix this, show me the person who is 200 years old.

We would have to 100x medical research spending before it was clearly overdone.

replies(2): >>44609899 #>>44611917 #
1. lm28469 ◴[] No.44609899[source]
You can 1000x the research if you want, a 50kg overweight person who doesn't exercise, drink alcohol and lives next to a highway is statistically fucked no matter what. You'd need straight up magic to undo the damages

You're not going to fix lifestyle diseases with drugs, and lifestyle diseases are the leading cause of death

replies(1): >>44611905 #
2. schmidtleonard ◴[] No.44611905[source]
Show me the 200 year old person.