←back to thread

291 points dataflow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.443s | source
Show context
femiagbabiaka ◴[] No.44605114[source]
How many rights will we be asked to give up in order to squash anti-war sentiment?
replies(8): >>44605211 #>>44605300 #>>44605796 #>>44605993 #>>44606143 #>>44606147 #>>44606330 #>>44607026 #
one-note ◴[] No.44605300[source]
Quite a lot. The #1 right, for instance: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_t...

Curious why this is downvoted?

replies(3): >>44605788 #>>44605813 #>>44605844 #
cayley_graph ◴[] No.44605788[source]
I've noticed many right-leaning tech types give quite a lot of lip service to free speech when it's about someone getting banned from a mailing list for being an asshole, and not so much when it's the government quashing protest against genocide. I'll personally always defend the idea of free speech, no matter the side.
replies(4): >>44605899 #>>44606421 #>>44606471 #>>44607483 #
noqc ◴[] No.44606471[source]
Then you should read the article.
replies(1): >>44606740 #
1. cayley_graph ◴[] No.44606740[source]
I did. I believe this sort of stuff to be, at least morally, a violation of the 4A. It's no secret that the anti-Israel protests have gotten an inordinate amount of attention from the law relative to any harm caused, and overstepping bounds like this even to catch actual criminals (as happened here) isn't worth the price paid in liberty.

My comment was targeted at the government/ICE's notorious targeting of anti-Israel protesters broadly. It's absolutely clear that we're giving up rights left and right for this total farce, the same way we did for 9/11. It is imperative to the survival of liberal democracy that this ceases.

replies(1): >>44607258 #