←back to thread

291 points dataflow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
reverendsteveii ◴[] No.44604806[source]
>bypassed ban

Broke the law is the phrase we want here. They did an illegal thing. They didn't just scoot past a barrier, they violated people's rights.

replies(3): >>44604863 #>>44604877 #>>44605090 #
gruez ◴[] No.44604863[source]
>They didn't just scoot past a barrier, they violated people's rights.

Claiming that an administrative policy against using facial recognition as a "right" seems like a stretch.

replies(3): >>44604915 #>>44609713 #>>44614857 #
elashri ◴[] No.44604915[source]
> Claiming that an administrative policy against using facial recognition as a "right" seems like a stretch.

This is such strange way to describe "right for privacy".

replies(2): >>44604959 #>>44605173 #
kazinator ◴[] No.44605173[source]
Hurling a rock at someone is privacy now?
replies(2): >>44605548 #>>44609424 #
1. elashri ◴[] No.44605548[source]
This is the classical problem of do the police have the right to violate rules and law in order to bring case or not? The problem is that this open the box of abuse of power and rights of people to become the norm.