←back to thread

293 points dataflow | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.633s | source
Show context
gruez ◴[] No.44604843[source]
>A city fire marshal used FDNY’s access to a facial recognition software to help NYPD detectives identify a pro-Palestinian protester at Columbia University, circumventing policies that tightly restrict the Police Department’s use of the technology.

Why does the fire department need access to run facial recognition?

replies(4): >>44604976 #>>44605387 #>>44605709 #>>44605831 #
hearsathought ◴[] No.44605387[source]
Cause israel. The fire marshal probably is pro-israel or israel has dirt on him.

All because of a protest against a foreign country committing acts of genocide. It's unbelievable when you think about it.

replies(1): >>44605460 #
1. reactordev ◴[] No.44605688[source]
Just because it was written does not make it true. Cops have come up with all sorts of excuses to justify their criminal behavior including just plain old “I’m a cop” defense.
2. buran77 ◴[] No.44605700[source]
One thing's for sure, it always starts with the "terrorists" and "pedophiles". But it would never be used against someone like you, would it?

Turkeys voting for Thanksgiving is what this is.

3. hearsathought ◴[] No.44605721[source]
> He hit (or at least was accused of hitting) a counter-protester with a rock. It's in the 3rd paragraph of the article.

And? Do you think the authorities would go to such extremes over a rock throwing incident if it didn't involve israel? Better yet, if it was the pro-israel counter-protestor throwing the rock, do you think the authorities would have wasted a second investigating the matter? Let alone breaking the law to get the suspect?