←back to thread

291 points dataflow | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.229s | source | bottom
Show context
neuroelectron ◴[] No.44605116[source]
Wow, NYPD is full of people who support Israel?
replies(2): >>44605193 #>>44606823 #
1. nroets ◴[] No.44605193[source]
The article says he was suspected of hate crime assault. Then the police has a duty to act.

Edit: While I said "duty" I meant that I really hope the that the police investigate all allegations of hate crime assault properly.

replies(5): >>44605449 #>>44605531 #>>44605609 #>>44605658 #>>44607957 #
2. ◴[] No.44605449[source]
3. neuroelectron ◴[] No.44605531[source]
Certain animals are more equal than others.
4. maximinus_thrax ◴[] No.44605609[source]
The police has absolutely no duty to act whatsoever. See Warren v. District of Columbia.
5. g8oz ◴[] No.44605658[source]
"reduced to a misdemeanor of second degree aggravated harassment" so it looks like the charge was exaggerated in the 1st place. The media and authorities tend to portray Zionist provocateurs as the second coming of Anne Frank when they get into trouble. Something similar happened when Israeli soccer hooligans got roughed up in Amsterdam.
6. isleyaardvark ◴[] No.44607957[source]
The ban on NYPD's usage of facial recognition doesn't have exceptions based on the category of suspected crime.