←back to thread

586 points gausswho | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.677s | source
1. jdlshore ◴[] No.44506101[source]
This is the definition of an ad hominem attack. If you want to prove the judges are partisan, talk about the flaws in the ruling, not who appointed them.
replies(2): >>44506649 #>>44506663 #
2. mschuster91 ◴[] No.44506649[source]
That's the problem that automatically arises when the justice system is made out of political appointments instead of career tracks.

There will always be the suspicion of political bias, and the haphazard way the administrations ever since Obama went in how nominations were done adds more fuel to the fire.